↓ Skip to main content

Hearing people perceiving deaf people through sign language interpreters at work: on the loss of self through interpreted communication

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Communication Research, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 337)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hearing people perceiving deaf people through sign language interpreters at work: on the loss of self through interpreted communication
Published in
Journal of Applied Communication Research, February 2019
DOI 10.1080/00909882.2019.1574018
Authors

Alys Young, Rosemary Oram, Jemina Napier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 96 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Researcher 7 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 35 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 10 10%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 6 6%
Arts and Humanities 6 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 5%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 40 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,958,319
of 25,403,829 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Communication Research
#50
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,969
of 447,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Communication Research
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,403,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.