↓ Skip to main content

Study of negative pressure wound therapy as an adjunct treatment for acute burns in children (SONATA in C): protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study of negative pressure wound therapy as an adjunct treatment for acute burns in children (SONATA in C): protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3223-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cody C. Frear, Bronwyn Griffin, Leila Cuttle, Steven M. McPhail, Roy Kimble

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 20%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 30 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 30 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,225,231
of 15,383,396 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,251
of 4,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,321
of 388,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,383,396 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them