↓ Skip to main content

A Court of Sticks and Branches: Indian Jurisdiction in Colonial Mexico and Beyond

Overview of attention for article published in American Historical Review, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Court of Sticks and Branches: Indian Jurisdiction in Colonial Mexico and Beyond
Published in
American Historical Review, February 2019
DOI 10.1093/ahr/rhy574
Authors

Bianca Premo, Yanna Yannakakis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,255,226
of 12,988,515 outputs
Outputs from American Historical Review
#97
of 1,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,056
of 319,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Historical Review
#9
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,988,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,929 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.