↓ Skip to main content

A Court of Sticks and Branches: Indian Jurisdiction in Colonial Mexico and Beyond

Overview of attention for article published in American Historical Review, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Court of Sticks and Branches: Indian Jurisdiction in Colonial Mexico and Beyond
Published in
American Historical Review, February 2019
DOI 10.1093/ahr/rhy574
Authors

Bianca Premo, Yanna Yannakakis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,417,918
of 13,981,819 outputs
Outputs from American Historical Review
#119
of 2,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,480
of 369,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Historical Review
#11
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,981,819 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.