You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Goal-directed therapy in patients with early acute kidney injury: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinics, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.6061/clinics/2018/e327 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Prata Amendola, João Manoel Silva-Jr, Taisa Carvalho, Luciana Coelho Sanches, Ulysses Vasconcelos de Andrade e Silva, Rosana Almeida, Emmanuel Burdmann, Emerson Lima, Fabiana Ferreira Barbosa, Renata Souza Ferreira, Maria José C Carmona, Luiz Marcelo Sá Malbouisson, Fernando A M Nogueira, José Otavio Costa Auler-Júnior, Suzana Margareth Lobo |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,667,638
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#759
of 1,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,066
of 442,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#42
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.