↓ Skip to main content

Dopamine versus dobutamine for hypotensive preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dopamine versus dobutamine for hypotensive preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001242
Authors

Nimish V Subhedar, N J Shaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Other 13 13%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 26 27%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 60%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 17 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2012.
All research outputs
#9,676,723
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,219
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,569
of 258,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#406
of 462 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 462 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.