↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Wild vegetables do not lie: Comparative gastronomic ethnobotany and ethnolinguistics on the Greek traces of the Mediterranean Diet of southeastern Italy

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Botanica Brasilica, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wild vegetables do not lie: Comparative gastronomic ethnobotany and ethnolinguistics on the Greek traces of the Mediterranean Diet of southeastern Italy
Published in
Acta Botanica Brasilica, June 2019
DOI 10.1590/0102-33062018abb0323
Authors

Andrea Pieroni, Valentina Cattero

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Lecturer 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 13 28%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 49%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 9 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,033,722
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#184
of 343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,181
of 349,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 343 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.

This page is provided by Altmetric.