↓ Skip to main content

Combination fluticasone and salmeterol versus fixed dose combination budesonide and formoterol for chronic asthma in adults and children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combination fluticasone and salmeterol versus fixed dose combination budesonide and formoterol for chronic asthma in adults and children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004106.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toby J Lasserson, Giovanni Ferrara, Lucio Casali

Abstract

Long-acting beta-agonists are a common second line treatment in people with asthma inadequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. Single device inhalers combine a long-acting beta-agonist with an inhaled steroid delivering both drugs as a maintenance treatment regimen. This updated review compares two fixed-dose options, fluticasone/salmeterol FP/SALand budesonide/formoterol, since this comparison represents a common therapeutic choice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 22%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 22 21%
Unknown 16 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 22 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,983,868
of 15,625,935 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,667
of 11,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,272
of 221,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#212
of 517 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,625,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 517 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.