↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Review of Evidence Pertaining to Factors That Modify Risk of Early Childhood Caries

Overview of attention for article published in JDR Clinical & Translational Research, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 137)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic Review of Evidence Pertaining to Factors That Modify Risk of Early Childhood Caries
Published in
JDR Clinical & Translational Research, February 2019
DOI 10.1177/2380084418824262
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Moynihan, L.M. Tanner, R.D. Holmes, F. Hillier-Brown, A. Mashayekhi, S.A.M. Kelly, D. Craig

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 29 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#793,307
of 15,628,381 outputs
Outputs from JDR Clinical & Translational Research
#10
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,096
of 268,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JDR Clinical & Translational Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,628,381 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them