↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of provision of animal-source foods for supporting optimal growth and development in children 6 to 59 months of age

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of provision of animal-source foods for supporting optimal growth and development in children 6 to 59 months of age
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012818.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob C Eaton, Pamela Rothpletz-Puglia, Margaret R Dreker, Lora Iannotti, Chessa Lutter, Joyceline Kaganda, Pura Rayco-Solon

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 16%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 6 5%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 33 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 48 39%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,540,752
of 14,597,396 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,142
of 11,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,117
of 263,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,597,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.