↓ Skip to main content

Automated evaluation of consistency within the PubChem Compound database

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Data, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Automated evaluation of consistency within the PubChem Compound database
Published in
Scientific Data, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/sdata.2019.23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hesam Dashti, Jonathan R. Wedell, William M. Westler, John L. Markley, Hamid R. Eghbalnia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 33%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 7%
Computer Science 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2019.
All research outputs
#2,447,477
of 14,571,155 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#572
of 1,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,126
of 264,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#23
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,571,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.