You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improved estimation of aboveground biomass in wheat from RGB imagery and point cloud data acquired with a low-cost unmanned aerial vehicle system
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0402-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ning Lu, Jie Zhou, Zixu Han, Dong Li, Qiang Cao, Xia Yao, Yongchao Tian, Yan Zhu, Weixing Cao, Tao Cheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
Researcher | 18 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 4% |
Other | 26 | 13% |
Unknown | 75 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 25% |
Engineering | 19 | 9% |
Environmental Science | 14 | 7% |
Computer Science | 12 | 6% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 7% |
Unknown | 83 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,440,221
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#722
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,039
of 352,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.