↓ Skip to main content

Stable isotopes to detect food-conditioned bears and to evaluate human-bear management

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Wildlife Management, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stable isotopes to detect food-conditioned bears and to evaluate human-bear management
Published in
Journal of Wildlife Management, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/jwmg.318
Authors

John B. Hopkins, Paul L. Koch, Charles C. Schwartz, Jake M. Ferguson, Schuyler S. Greenleaf, Steven T. Kalinowski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Japan 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 147 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 23%
Student > Master 35 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Other 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 29 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 107 65%
Environmental Science 38 23%
Unspecified 13 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 2 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#6,565,307
of 12,465,035 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#898
of 1,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,818
of 221,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#14
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,465,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,305 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.