You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stable isotopes to detect food‐conditioned bears and to evaluate human‐bear management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Wildlife Management, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jwmg.318 |
| Authors |
John B. Hopkins, Paul L. Koch, Charles C. Schwartz, Jake M. Ferguson, Schuyler S. Greenleaf, Steven T. Kalinowski |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 170 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 20% |
| Researcher | 36 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 111 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 41 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2012.
All research outputs
#14,285,663
of 24,586,986 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Wildlife Management
#1,840
of 2,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,980
of 252,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Wildlife Management
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,586,986 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.