↓ Skip to main content

Interaction between Tobacco and Alcohol Use and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: Pooled Analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
5 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
816 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
661 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interaction between Tobacco and Alcohol Use and the Risk of Head and Neck Cancer: Pooled Analysis in the International Head and Neck Cancer Epidemiology Consortium
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, February 2009
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-0347
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mia Hashibe, Paul Brennan, Shu-chun Chuang, Stefania Boccia, Xavier Castellsague, Chu Chen, Maria Paula Curado, Luigino Dal Maso, Alexander W. Daudt, Eleonora Fabianova, Leticia Fernandez, Victor Wünsch-Filho, Silvia Franceschi, Richard B. Hayes, Rolando Herrero, Karl Kelsey, Sergio Koifman, Carlo La Vecchia, Philip Lazarus, Fabio Levi, Juan J. Lence, Dana Mates, Elena Matos, Ana Menezes, Michael D. McClean, Joshua Muscat, Jose Eluf-Neto, Andrew F. Olshan, Mark Purdue, Peter Rudnai, Stephen M. Schwartz, Elaine Smith, Erich M. Sturgis, Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska, Renato Talamini, Qingyi Wei, Deborah M. Winn, Oxana Shangina, Agnieszka Pilarska, Zuo-Feng Zhang, Gilles Ferro, Julien Berthiller, Paolo Boffetta

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 661 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 646 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 13%
Student > Bachelor 84 13%
Student > Master 79 12%
Researcher 66 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 58 9%
Other 144 22%
Unknown 142 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 274 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 68 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 4%
Social Sciences 13 2%
Other 68 10%
Unknown 170 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#739,574
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#280
of 4,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,604
of 171,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#3
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.