↓ Skip to main content

The Limits of Earthquake Early Warning Accuracy and Best Alerting Strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
118 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Limits of Earthquake Early Warning Accuracy and Best Alerting Strategy
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-39384-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah E. Minson, Annemarie S. Baltay, Elizabeth S. Cochran, Thomas C. Hanks, Morgan T. Page, Sara K. McBride, Kevin R. Milner, Men-Andrin Meier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 29 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 27%
Engineering 17 17%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 30 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 165. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#247,921
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,898
of 141,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,471
of 367,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#105
of 4,313 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,313 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.