↓ Skip to main content

COPD exacerbations in general practice: variability in oral prednisolone courses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
COPD exacerbations in general practice: variability in oral prednisolone courses
Published in
BMC Primary Care, January 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-13-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianne de Vries, Annette J Berendsen, Henk EP Bosveld, Huib AM Kerstjens, Thys van der Molen

Abstract

The use of oral corticosteroids as treatment of COPD exacerbations in primary care is well established and evidence-based. However, the most appropriate dosage regimen has not been determined and remains controversial. Corticosteroid therapy is associated with a number of undesirable side effects, including hyperglycaemias, so differences in prescribing might be relevant. This study examines the differences between GPs in dosage and duration of prednisolone treatment in patients with a COPD exacerbation. It also investigates the number of general practitioners (GPs) who adjust their treatment according to the presence of diabetic co-morbidity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 27 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 17%
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 7 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2012.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,232
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,552
of 249,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#9
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.