↓ Skip to main content

Dispersive viscosurgical devices demonstrate greater efficacy in protecting corneal endothelium in vitro

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open Ophthalmology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dispersive viscosurgical devices demonstrate greater efficacy in protecting corneal endothelium in vitro
Published in
BMJ Open Ophthalmology, February 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmjophth-2018-000227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timur Mert Yildirim, Gerd U Auffarth, Hyeck-Soo Son, Ramin Khoramnia, Donald John Munro, Patrick R Merz

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,556,243
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#229
of 317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,935
of 351,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open Ophthalmology
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.