↓ Skip to main content

The Consortium of Metabolomics Studies (COMETS): Metabolomics in 47 Prospective Cohort Studies

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Epidemiology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Consortium of Metabolomics Studies (COMETS): Metabolomics in 47 Prospective Cohort Studies
Published in
American Journal of Epidemiology, February 2019
DOI 10.1093/aje/kwz028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bing Yu, Krista A Zanetti, Marinella Temprosa, Demetrius Albanes, Nathan Appel, Clara Barrios Barrera, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Eric Boerwinkle, Juan P Casas, Clary Clish, Caroline Dale, Abbas Dehghan, Andriy Derkach, A Heather Eliassen, Paul Elliott, Eoin Fahy, Christian Gieger, Marc J Gunter, Sei Harada, Tamara Harris, Deron R Herr, David Herrington, Joel N Hirschhorn, Elise Hoover, Ann W Hsing, Mattias Johansson, Rachel S Kelly, Chin Meng Khoo, Mika Kivimäki, Bruce S Kristal, Claudia Langenberg, Jessica Lasky-Su, Deborah A Lawlor, Luca A Lotta, Massimo Mangino, Loïc Le Marchand, Ewy Mathé, Charles E Matthews, Cristina Menni, Lorelei A Mucci, Rachel Murphy, Matej Oresic, Eric Orwoll, Jennifer Ose, Alexandre C Pereira, Mary C Playdon, Lucilla Poston, Jackie Price, Qibin Qi, Kathryn Rexrode, Adam Risch, Joshua Sampson, Wei Jie Seow, Howard D Sesso, Svati H Shah, Xiao-Ou Shu, Gordon C S Smith, Ulla Sovio, Victoria L Stevens, Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon, Toru Takebayashi, Therese Tillin, Ruth Travis, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Cornelia M Ulrich, Ramachandran S Vasan, Mukesh Verma, Ying Wang, Nick J Wareham, Andrew Wong, Naji Younes, Hua Zhao, Wei Zheng, Steven C Moore

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Chemistry 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,668,880
of 14,091,489 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Epidemiology
#1,418
of 7,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,847
of 261,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Epidemiology
#21
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,091,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.