You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evidence of the impacts of metal mining and the effectiveness of mining mitigation measures on social–ecological systems in Arctic and boreal regions: a systematic map protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental Evidence, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13750-019-0152-8 |
Authors |
Neal R. Haddaway, Steven J. Cooke, Pamela Lesser, Biljana Macura, Annika E. Nilsson, Jessica J. Taylor, Kaisa Raito |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 5 | 21% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 67% |
Scientists | 6 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 440 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 73 | 17% |
Student > Master | 53 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 7% |
Researcher | 23 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 5% |
Other | 50 | 11% |
Unknown | 186 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 55 | 13% |
Engineering | 43 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
Other | 91 | 21% |
Unknown | 199 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#743,508
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#16
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,454
of 366,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,803 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.