You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Education of family members to support weaning to solids and nutrition in infants born preterm
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012240.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zenab Elfzzani, T'ng Chang Kwok, Shalini Ojha, Jon Dorling |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 55% |
| Ireland | 3 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 78 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 88 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,467,894
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,030
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,592
of 367,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.