↓ Skip to main content

Parenteral versus oral iron therapy for adults and children with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
25 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parenteral versus oral iron therapy for adults and children with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007857.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma L O'Lone, Elisabeth M Hodson, Ionut Nistor, Davide Bolignano, Angela C Webster, Jonathan C Craig

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Poland 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Unspecified 9 8%
Other 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 54%
Unspecified 13 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#965,857
of 13,459,972 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,982
of 10,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,523
of 253,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,459,972 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.