↓ Skip to main content

Influenza vaccination and myocarditis among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 3,460)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
561 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influenza vaccination and myocarditis among patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40425-019-0535-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magid Awadalla, Doll Lauren Alexandra Golden, Syed S. Mahmood, Raza M. Alvi, Nathaniel D. Mercaldo, Malek Z. O. Hassan, Dahlia Banerji, Adam Rokicki, Connor Mulligan, Sean P. T. Murphy, Maeve Jones-O’Connor, Justine V. Cohen, Lucie M. Heinzerling, Merna Armanious, Ryan J. Sullivan, Rongras Damrongwatanasuk, Carol L. Chen, Dipti Gupta, Michael C. Kirchberger, Javid J. Moslehi, Sachin P. Shah, Sarju Ganatra, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Muhammad A. Rizvi, Gagan Sahni, Alexander R. Lyon, Carlo G. Tocchetti, Valentina Mercurio, Franck Thuny, Stephane Ederhy, Michael Mahmoudi, Donald P. Lawrence, John D. Groarke, Anju Nohria, Michael G. Fradley, Kerry L. Reynolds, Tomas G. Neilan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 561 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Unspecified 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 23 25%
Unknown 31 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 37%
Unspecified 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 37 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 354. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#92,003
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#26
of 3,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,865
of 367,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#1
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.