You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sequencing of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012873.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Milita Zaheed, Nicholas Wilcken, Melina L Willson, Dianne L O'Connell, Annabel Goodwin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 46% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 194 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 85 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 89 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,867,713
of 24,849,927 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,104
of 12,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,269
of 358,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,849,927 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.