↓ Skip to main content

Identifying barriers to the availability and use of Magnesium Sulphate Injection in resource poor countries: A case study in Zambia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying barriers to the availability and use of Magnesium Sulphate Injection in resource poor countries: A case study in Zambia
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-10-340
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna L Ridge, Lisa A Bero, Suzanne R Hill

Abstract

Pre-eclampsia and eclampsia are serious complications of pregnancy and major causes of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. According to systematic reviews and WHO guidelines magnesium sulphate injection (MgSO4) should be the first -line treatment for severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. Studies have shown that this safe and effective medicine is unavailable and underutilized in many resource poor countries. The objective of this study was to identify barriers to the availability and use of MgSO4 in the Zambian Public Health System.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 173 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 26%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 33 19%
Unknown 40 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 13%
Social Sciences 17 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 47 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2012.
All research outputs
#14,142,336
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,034
of 7,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,550
of 180,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#19
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.