↓ Skip to main content

A review of eye tracking for understanding and improving diagnostic interpretation

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of eye tracking for understanding and improving diagnostic interpretation
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41235-019-0159-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tad T. Brunyé, Trafton Drew, Donald L. Weaver, Joann G. Elmore

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Lecturer 5 7%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 14 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Engineering 9 12%
Computer Science 6 8%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 17 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,659,133
of 14,354,509 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#110
of 138 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,841
of 263,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,354,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 138 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them