↓ Skip to main content

Using palaeo-climate comparisons to constrain future projections in CMIP5

Overview of attention for article published in Climate of the Past, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using palaeo-climate comparisons to constrain future projections in CMIP5
Published in
Climate of the Past, February 2014
DOI 10.5194/cp-10-221-2014
Authors

G. A. Schmidt, J. D. Annan, P. J. Bartlein, B. I. Cook, E. Guilyardi, J. C. Hargreaves, S. P. Harrison, M. Kageyama, A. N. LeGrande, B. Konecky, S. Lovejoy, M. E. Mann, V. Masson-Delmotte, C. Risi, D. Thompson, A. Timmermann, L.-B. Tremblay, P. Yiou

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Germany 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Jamaica 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 256 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 76 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 19%
Student > Master 25 9%
Professor 14 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 48 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 133 49%
Environmental Science 48 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Engineering 5 2%
Physics and Astronomy 4 1%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 59 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,312,648
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Climate of the Past
#352
of 1,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,513
of 322,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate of the Past
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.