↓ Skip to main content

日本皮膚科学会円形脱毛症診療ガイドライン2017年版

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本皮膚科学会円形脱毛症診療ガイドライン2017年版
Published in
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, December 2017
DOI 10.14924/dermatol.127.2741
Authors

日本皮膚科学会円形脱毛症ガイドライン作成委員会, 坪井 良治, 板見 智, 眞鍋 求, 天羽 康之, 伊藤 泰介, 乾 重樹, 植木 理恵, 内山 真樹, 大山 学, 幸野 健, 齊藤 典充, 下村 裕, 中村 元信, 成澤 寛, 原田 和俊

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#10,671,106
of 13,415,696 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#32
of 40 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,704
of 253,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,415,696 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them