You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The environment and schizophrenia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature09563 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jim van Os, Gunter Kenis, Bart P. F. Rutten |
| Abstract |
Psychotic syndromes can be understood as disorders of adaptation to social context. Although heritability is often emphasized, onset is associated with environmental factors such as early life adversity, growing up in an urban environment, minority group position and cannabis use, suggesting that exposure may have an impact on the developing 'social' brain during sensitive periods. Therefore heritability, as an index of genetic influence, may be of limited explanatory power unless viewed in the context of interaction with social effects. Longitudinal research is needed to uncover gene-environment interplay that determines how expression of vulnerability in the general population may give rise to more severe psychopathology. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,890 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | <1% |
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| Brazil | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 6 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1796 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 287 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 280 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 267 | 14% |
| Researcher | 224 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 112 | 6% |
| Other | 405 | 21% |
| Unknown | 315 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 473 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 300 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 229 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 210 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 56 | 3% |
| Other | 214 | 11% |
| Unknown | 408 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#353,312
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#18,253
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#946
of 113,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#38
of 690 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 690 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.