↓ Skip to main content

Roto++

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Roto++
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925973
Authors

Wenbin Li, Fabio Viola, Jonathan Starck, Gabriel J. Brostow, Neill D. F. Campbell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 5%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 28 67%
Engineering 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Design 1 2%
Unknown 5 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,199,838
of 16,822,220 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#740
of 2,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,550
of 272,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,822,220 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them