↓ Skip to main content

Roto++

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Roto++
Published in
ACM Transactions on Graphics, July 2016
DOI 10.1145/2897824.2925973
Authors

Wenbin Li, Fabio Viola, Jonathan Starck, Gabriel J. Brostow, Neill D. F. Campbell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 5%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 27 73%
Engineering 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Design 1 3%
Unknown 2 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#11,547,516
of 14,574,801 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#1,628
of 1,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,528
of 263,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Graphics
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,574,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.