↓ Skip to main content

Are there benefits from using bone-borne maxillary expansion instead of tooth-borne maxillary expansion? A systematic review with meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Orthodontics, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 198)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are there benefits from using bone-borne maxillary expansion instead of tooth-borne maxillary expansion? A systematic review with meta-analysis
Published in
Progress in Orthodontics, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40510-019-0261-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marietta Krüsi, Theodore Eliades, Spyridon N. Papageorgiou

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unknown 17 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,330,480
of 15,019,833 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#10
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,841
of 264,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,019,833 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them