You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are there benefits from using bone-borne maxillary expansion instead of tooth-borne maxillary expansion? A systematic review with meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Orthodontics, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40510-019-0261-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marietta Krüsi, Theodore Eliades, Spyridon N. Papageorgiou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| South Africa | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 57 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,657,203
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#13
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,230
of 367,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them