↓ Skip to main content

Reflection-in-practice: A survey of Australian occupational therapists

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reflection-in-practice: A survey of Australian occupational therapists
Published in
Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, January 2019
DOI 10.1111/1440-1630.12559
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Knightbridge

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%
Neuroscience 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,147,469
of 12,991,173 outputs
Outputs from Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
#270
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,966
of 248,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Occupational Therapy Journal
#17
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,991,173 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.