You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Animal cultures matter for conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aaw3557 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippa Brakes, Sasha R X Dall, Lucy M Aplin, Stuart Bearhop, Emma L Carroll, Paolo Ciucci, Vicki Fishlock, John K B Ford, Ellen C Garland, Sally A Keith, Peter K McGregor, Sarah L Mesnick, Michael J Noad, Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara, Martha M Robbins, Mark P Simmonds, Fernando Spina, Alex Thornton, Paul R Wade, Martin J Whiting, James Williams, Luke Rendell, Hal Whitehead, Andrew Whiten, Christian Rutz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 294 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 53 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 44 | 15% |
| Spain | 9 | 3% |
| Germany | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Finland | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 123 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 182 | 62% |
| Scientists | 97 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 368 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 17% |
| Researcher | 57 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 9% |
| Professor | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 58 | 16% |
| Unknown | 91 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 135 | 37% |
| Environmental Science | 51 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 10% |
| Unknown | 117 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 456. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#61,223
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Science
#2,300
of 83,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,260
of 368,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#71
of 1,228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,254 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.