↓ Skip to main content

Applying concepts of general resilience to large river ecosystems: A case study from the Upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Indicators, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying concepts of general resilience to large river ecosystems: A case study from the Upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers
Published in
Ecological Indicators, June 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.02.002
Authors

Kristen L. Bouska, Jeffrey N. Houser, Nathan R. De Jager, Molly Van Appledorn, James T. Rogala

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 28%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,767,705
of 14,395,965 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#929
of 1,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,041
of 263,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#40
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,395,965 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.