You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ChIA-PET tool for comprehensive chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guoliang Li, Melissa J Fullwood, Han Xu, Fabianus Hendriyan Mulawadi, Stoyan Velkov, Vinsensius Vega, Pramila Nuwantha Ariyaratne, Yusoff Bin Mohamed, Hong-Sain Ooi, Chandana Tennakoon, Chia-Lin Wei, Yijun Ruan, Wing-Kin Sung |
| Abstract |
Chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tag sequencing (ChIA-PET) is a new technology to study genome-wide long-range chromatin interactions bound by protein factors. Here we present ChIA-PET Tool, a software package for automatic processing of ChIA-PET sequence data, including linker filtering, mapping tags to reference genomes, identifying protein binding sites and chromatin interactions, and displaying the results on a graphical genome browser. ChIA-PET Tool is fast, accurate, comprehensive, user-friendly, and open source (available at http://chiapet.gis.a-star.edu.sg). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 571 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 522 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 174 | 30% |
| Researcher | 152 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 66 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 24 | 4% |
| Other | 71 | 12% |
| Unknown | 46 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 313 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 130 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 32 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 3% |
| Engineering | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 3% |
| Unknown | 55 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,703,883
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,393
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,949
of 102,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#3
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.