↓ Skip to main content

Ocular toxicity of intravitreal melphalan for retinoblastoma in Chinese patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ocular toxicity of intravitreal melphalan for retinoblastoma in Chinese patients
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12886-019-1059-4
Authors

Kang Xue, Hui Ren, Fengxi Meng, Rui Zhang, Jiang Qian

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 60%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 80%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,171,528
of 13,415,438 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#51
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,260
of 253,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,415,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them