You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dual-process cognitive interventions to enhance diagnostic reasoning: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004417 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Ann Lambe, Gary O'Reilly, Brendan D Kelly, Sarah Curristan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 19% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 48% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 73 | 31% |
| Unknown | 44 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 103 | 44% |
| Psychology | 23 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Engineering | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,426,969
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#963
of 2,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,477
of 412,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#36
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.