You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Check Your Truth Conditions! Clarifying the Relationship between Theories of Causation and Social Science Methods for Causal Inference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sociological Methods & Research, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0049124119826156 |
| Authors |
Ingo Rohlfing, Christina Isabel Zuber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 28% |
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 37 | 52% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,125,790
of 24,749,767 outputs
Outputs from Sociological Methods & Research
#213
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,073
of 359,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociological Methods & Research
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,749,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.