↓ Skip to main content

“Conceiving God’s Children”: Toward a Flexible Model of Reproductive Decision-Making

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Anthropology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
“Conceiving God’s Children”: Toward a Flexible Model of Reproductive Decision-Making
Published in
Medical Anthropology, February 2019
DOI 10.1080/01459740.2019.1570191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lea Taragin-Zeller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,192,439
of 13,755,046 outputs
Outputs from Medical Anthropology
#280
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,780
of 254,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Anthropology
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,755,046 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.