↓ Skip to main content

Reserves as tools for alleviating impacts of marine disease

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
36 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
42 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reserves as tools for alleviating impacts of marine disease
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, March 2016
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0210
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joleah B. Lamb, Amelia S. Wenger, Michelle J. Devlin, Daniela M. Ceccarelli, David H. Williamson, Bette L. Willis

Abstract

Marine protected areas can prevent over-exploitation, but their effect on marine diseases is less clear. We examined how marine reserves can reduce diseases affecting reef-building corals following acute and chronic disturbances. One year after a severe tropical cyclone, corals inside reserves had sevenfold lower levels of disease than those in non-reserves. Similarly, disease prevalence was threefold lower on reserve reefs following chronic exposure to terrestrial run-off from a degraded river catchment, when exposure duration was below the long-term site average. Examination of 35 predictor variables indicated that lower levels of derelict fishing line and injured corals inside reserves were correlated with lower levels of coral disease in both case studies, signifying that successful disease mitigation occurs when activities that damage reefs are restricted. Conversely, reserves were ineffective in moderating disease when sites were exposed to higher than average levels of run-off, demonstrating that reductions in water quality undermine resilience afforded by reserve protection. In addition to implementing protected areas, we highlight that disease management efforts should also target improving water quality and limiting anthropogenic activities that cause injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 153 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 42 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 42 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Unspecified 5 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 49 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 345. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#96,771
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#65
of 7,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,678
of 314,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.