↓ Skip to main content

Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Global Health Research and Policy, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Global Health Research and Policy, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41256-019-0096-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Majdi M. Sabahelzain, Ahmed Gamal Eldin, Suad Babiker, Caroline W. Kabiru, Muna Eltayeb

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 22%
Student > Master 4 22%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 33%
Social Sciences 4 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,374,203
of 14,381,489 outputs
Outputs from Global Health Research and Policy
#47
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,211
of 264,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health Research and Policy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,381,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them