You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Distinct online and offline effects of alpha and beta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on continuous bimanual performance and task-set switching
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-39900-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirstin-Friederike Heise, Thiago Santos Monteiro, Inge Leunissen, Dante Mantini, Stephan P. Swinnen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 20 | 25% |
| Psychology | 11 | 14% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#18,670,143
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#94,705
of 125,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,939
of 353,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,468
of 4,435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.