↓ Skip to main content

Physical exercise training for type 3 spinal muscular atrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical exercise training for type 3 spinal muscular atrophy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012120.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bart Bartels, Jacqueline Montes, W Ludo van der Pol, Janke F de Groot

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 22%
Sports and Recreations 6 5%
Unspecified 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 35 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,831,970
of 14,596,192 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,156
of 11,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,929
of 264,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,596,192 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.