You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Delivering stepped care: an analysis of implementation in routine practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-7-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A Richards, Peter Bower, Christina Pagel, Alice Weaver, Martin Utley, John Cape, Steve Pilling, Karina Lovell, Simon Gilbody, Judy Leibowitz, Lilian Owens, Roger Paxton, Sue Hennessy, Angela Simpson, Steve Gallivan, David Tomson, Christos Vasilakis |
| Abstract |
In the United Kingdom, clinical guidelines recommend that services for depression and anxiety should be structured around a stepped care model, where patients receive treatment at different 'steps,' with the intensity of treatment (i.e., the amount and type) increasing at each step if they fail to benefit at previous steps. There are very limited data available on the implementation of this model, particularly on the intensity of psychological treatment at each step. Our objective was to describe patient pathways through stepped care services and the impact of this on patient flow and management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 207 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 20% |
| Unknown | 31 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 85 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,116,475
of 25,262,379 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#900
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,951
of 257,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,262,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.