You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neutron imaging and modelling inclined vortex driven thin films
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-39307-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy E. Solheim, Filomena Salvemini, Stuart B. Dalziel, Colin L. Raston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 47% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 3 | 33% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 33% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,090,327
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#26,225
of 125,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,746
of 353,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,106
of 4,435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.