You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Impact of the Southwark and Lambeth Integrated Care Older People’s Programme on hospital utilisation and costs: controlled time series and cost-consequence analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Open, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024220 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Josephine Exley, Gary A Abel, José-Luis Fernandez, Emma Pitchforth, Silvia Mendonca, Miaoqing Yang, Martin Roland, Alistair McGuire |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 32 | 59% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 26 | 48% |
Scientists | 13 | 24% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 25 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Psychology | 2 | 3% |
Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 29 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2019.
All research outputs
#877,785
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#1,510
of 25,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,586
of 369,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#65
of 770 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 770 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.