↓ Skip to main content

Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) for treating venous leg ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) for treating venous leg ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012164.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiliang Caleb Lin, Paula M Loveland, Renea V Johnston, Michael Bruce, Carolina D Weller

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Unspecified 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,631,354
of 14,263,181 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,312
of 10,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,219
of 263,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,263,181 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.