↓ Skip to main content

A welcoming guide to social media for cytopathologists: Tips, tricks, and the best practices of social cytopathology

Overview of attention for article published in CytoJournal, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 191)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A welcoming guide to social media for cytopathologists: Tips, tricks, and the best practices of social cytopathology
Published in
CytoJournal, February 2019
DOI 10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_1_18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fikret Dirilenoglu, Binnur Önal

Abstract

This guide provides an overview of social media (SoMe) use with the recent updates for the "cytopathologists and the ones interested in". Our aim was to introduce the basic terms and rules, the potential benefits and risks, and some tips and tricks for using SoMe. The two most popular SoMe platforms, Facebook and Twitter, were the focus of this article. Thus far, many pathologists have already proved how efficiently the SoMe services could be utilized; the same applies specifically to the community of cytopathology. In our opinion, the more CPs are involved in SoMe, the more connected, productive, and stronger the community will become.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Computer Science 2 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Psychology 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,682,118
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from CytoJournal
#6
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,094
of 456,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CytoJournal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them