↓ Skip to main content

A welcoming guide to social media for cytopathologists: Tips, tricks, and the best practices of social cytopathology.

Overview of attention for article published in CytoJournal, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A welcoming guide to social media for cytopathologists: Tips, tricks, and the best practices of social cytopathology.
Published in
CytoJournal, January 2019
DOI 10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_1_18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fikret Dirilenoglu, Binnur Önal

Abstract

This guide provides an overview of social media (SoMe) use with the recent updates for the "cytopathologists and the ones interested in". Our aim was to introduce the basic terms and rules, the potential benefits and risks, and some tips and tricks for using SoMe. The two most popular SoMe platforms, Facebook and Twitter, were the focus of this article. Thus far, many pathologists have already proved how efficiently the SoMe services could be utilized; the same applies specifically to the community of cytopathology. In our opinion, the more CPs are involved in SoMe, the more connected, productive, and stronger the community will become.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Unspecified 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Psychology 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2019.
All research outputs
#10,101,198
of 12,627,803 outputs
Outputs from CytoJournal
#42
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,054
of 137,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CytoJournal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,627,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them