You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A welcoming guide to social media for cytopathologists: Tips, tricks, and the best practices of social cytopathology
|
---|---|
Published in |
CytoJournal, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_1_18 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fikret Dirilenoglu, Binnur Önal |
Abstract |
This guide provides an overview of social media (SoMe) use with the recent updates for the "cytopathologists and the ones interested in". Our aim was to introduce the basic terms and rules, the potential benefits and risks, and some tips and tricks for using SoMe. The two most popular SoMe platforms, Facebook and Twitter, were the focus of this article. Thus far, many pathologists have already proved how efficiently the SoMe services could be utilized; the same applies specifically to the community of cytopathology. In our opinion, the more CPs are involved in SoMe, the more connected, productive, and stronger the community will become. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 31% |
India | 5 | 13% |
Spain | 5 | 13% |
Turkey | 2 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Bahrain | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Kenya | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 49% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 23% |
Scientists | 8 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 40% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Student > Master | 1 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 60% |
Computer Science | 2 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 20% |
Psychology | 1 | 20% |
Engineering | 1 | 20% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,682,118
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from CytoJournal
#6
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,094
of 456,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CytoJournal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them