↓ Skip to main content

Understanding Social Media

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
416 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding Social Media
Published in
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), March 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Purvi Parwani, Andrew D. Choi, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Samreen Raza, Tiffany Chen, Akhil Narang, Erin D. Michos, John P. Erwin, Mamas A. Mamas, Martha Gulati

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 416 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 267. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#40,993
of 12,680,099 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#118
of 11,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#989
of 161,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
#3
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,680,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,255 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.