↓ Skip to main content

Not so Normal Normals: Species Distribution Model Results are Sensitive to Choice of Climate Normals and Model Type

Overview of attention for article published in Climate, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Not so Normal Normals: Species Distribution Model Results are Sensitive to Choice of Climate Normals and Model Type
Published in
Climate, February 2019
DOI 10.3390/cli7030037
Authors

Catherine Jarnevich, Nicholas Young

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Researcher 3 43%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 86%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2019.
All research outputs
#6,567,307
of 12,875,825 outputs
Outputs from Climate
#56
of 209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,347
of 244,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,875,825 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.