You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Do cognitive heuristics underpin symptom appraisal for symptoms of cancer?: A secondary qualitative analysis across seven cancers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psycho-Oncology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1002/pon.5049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonja Kummer, Fiona M. Walter, Joseph Chilcot, Jon Emery, Stephen Sutton, Suzanne E. Scott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 75% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 21% |
| Psychology | 10 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,729,751
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Psycho-Oncology
#497
of 2,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,976
of 379,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psycho-Oncology
#15
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.