↓ Skip to main content

Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phylogenetic analysis of methanogens from the bovine rumen
Published in
BMC Microbiology, May 2001
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-1-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc F Whitford, Ronald M Teather, Robert J Forster

Abstract

Interest in methanogens from ruminants has resulted from the role of methane in global warming and from the fact that cattle typically lose 6 % of ingested energy as methane. Several species of methanogens have been isolated from ruminants. However they are difficult to culture, few have been consistently found in high numbers, and it is likely that major species of rumen methanogens are yet to be identified. Total DNA from clarified bovine rumen fluid was amplified using primers specific for Archaeal 16S rRNA gene sequences (rDNA). Phylogenetic analysis of 41 rDNA sequences identified three clusters of methanogens. The largest cluster contained two distinct subclusters with rDNA sequences similar to Methanobrevibacter ruminantium 16S rDNA. A second cluster contained sequences related to 16S rDNA from Methanosphaera stadtmanae, an organism not previously described in the rumen. The third cluster contained rDNA sequences that may form a novel group of rumen methanogens. The current set of 16S rRNA hybridization probes targeting methanogenic Archaea does not cover the phylogenetic diversity present in the rumen and possibly other gastro-intestinal tract environments. New probes and quantitative PCR assays are needed to determine the distribution of the newly identified methanogen clusters in rumen microbial communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 141 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 22 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Environmental Science 9 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 25 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2014.
All research outputs
#6,753,656
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#699
of 3,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,639
of 42,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them